August 12, 2007

  • The last plenary session of the Christians for Biblical Equality conference was awesome!!  The preaching was done by Jeanne Porter, Ph.D.  I found myself saying amen! aloud.  I think you had to be there.  However, here is some of the notes that I took... :)

    "New Wineskins for New Wine: 
    The Work for Gender Justice in the 21st Century"

    Matthew 9:14-17
    The question we need to ask as we contemplate this passage: What
    do the new wineskins look like for the 21st century? 

    Jesus was doing radical stuff and yet John’s disciples approached
    him to ask about fasting.  This is irony,
    since He has been doing all kinds of miracles, including feeding
    thousands.  In this dialogue, we see that
    Jesus refused to engage into this conversation. 
    He knew that John’s disciples weren’t just asking about fasting but were
    challenging His nontraditional approaches. 
    They were asking, “How dare you do things differently than we do?” 

    Jesus responded by shifting the conversation to the broader
    issue of the Kingdom by talking about the wedding banquet.  It was a time for worship and celebration and
    not a time for mourning.  It was as if he
    was saying to them that the gospel message of the Kingdom is like new wine with
    such fermentation that the old structures that you are holding onto, your old
    mindsets, and your old ways, and your old rules and your old paradigms can’t
    hold what I’m bringing in. 

    Their old wineskins served a purpose but it could not
    contain the power of the gospel and all the abundant blessings that Jesus was
    bringing in.   

    At that time, new wine was poured into new wineskins to
    complete the fermentation process. 
    During the fermentation process, the new skins could stretch to contain
    the wine without bursting.  Once the wineskin
    had been used, however, it became an old wineskin and had no more capacity for
    stretching.  Fermentation of grape juice
    will still happen if put in an old wineskin, but because it is now old
    wineskin, it will inevitably pop its seams and all the wine would burst. 

    New wine in old wineskin when burst will hurt both the wine
    and wineskin.  What we are referring to
    in this analogy -- the people on the move following God and the old church structures.  The structures have not changed enough to
    contain the movement of God at this time.  You may have been committed to working within
    the church to make changes toward gender justice, but there’s a limitation, a
    glass ceiling (and for some of us, a stained-glass ceiling) for moving into a
    higher position of influence even if God has given you a greater vision.  The old structure of the church is
    institutionalized, hierarchical.  And
    unless you have a husband or a father who supports you, you might not have a
    chance of fully fulfilling this greater vision.

    Perhaps it is time to put this new wine in new wineskin.

    Some examples of new wineskins in the last few years…

    Emmaus Community, Chicago
    A post-modern, emergent church that meets in a café and
    followers of Jesus can sip their cappuccino while singing their love of
    Jesus.  A man and woman started this
    church. She left her old church because they would not allow her to serve in
    this capacity.  When it started looking
    and acting like a traditional church, the leaders got nervous.  When they had so many people that they needed
    a building and were going to get pews, the leaders got nervous.  The fear was that it would not reach out to
    the post-modern generation.

    CARE
    CARE is an organization that sends care packages to help
    with poverty – all over the world.  They
    are now making ads that have a picture of a woman from a developing country and
    say, “She has the power to change her world. You have the power to help
    her.”  CARE is now focusing on empowering
    women.  They know if they want to have
    lasting impact on a community, they need to empower women.  As the familiar saying goes, “If you educate
    a man, you educate an individual.  If you
    educate a woman, you educate the entire community.”  They are zeroing in on the cause and needs of
    women.

    The Nat’l Consortium for Black Women in Ministry
    A place where black women in ministry could have support,
    band together to mentor the next generation – health, education and poverty as
    it affects black women.  They created the
    “decency initiative,” where they organized women and men to mount public
    pressure on the music industry to adopt a universal respect for all people, especially
    the women of color.  Hip hop and rap
    music has affected an entire generation of women, taking away their value and
    their dignity with the constant use of the N-word, the H-word, and the B-word
    in their songs, etc.

    These are examples of new wineskins, agents of change.

    Five things we can take away from this paradigm shift that
    we are seeing:

    1. Shifted
      from church focus to Kingdom focus. 
      The move of God is bigger than the four walls of the church.  Go out and be placed strategically in
      every arena of society (to bring His Kingdom to gender, race and
      class).  When the church loses its
      voice in these arenas, then men and women of God need to stand up.  Sometimes old wineskin gets so old, not
      only can it not change society but it ends up colluding with the society.   When the church loses its prophetic
      voice, it ends up colluding with the culture.  (e.g. a church (I missed the
      name/location of it) that participated in the slave trade; they colluded
      with the oppression)
    2. Inclusion
      is at the heart of what these women do. 
      Must keep the models inclusive. 
      Create the ferment, the tension. 
    3. Expand
      the definition of what it means to be a leader.  These women are leaders, trained and successful
      in their own right who saw a need to take it to another level.  They are change-makers.  Change your words, change the world.  They are changing the meaning of this
      word.
    4. Everyday
      transformation.  These women didn’t
      just write about it; they worked on everyday leadership.  They went out and did it.
    5. Each
      had a heart of legacy leadership.  They
      invested in raising up the next generation of leadership, transformers,
      agents of change.  Yesterday’s
      agents of change can become today’s status quo.  We can become too comfortable with the
      changes that we made and want stick to them and resist any further change.  We don’t want that.  We need to equip the next generation.

    God is always the God of change.  He says, “Behold I do a new thing!”  Can we see it?  

    The traditional structures of the church cannot hold this
    new elixir of God’s empowerment to women and men.  We need to follow him and create new wineskins.

    Here's a short video clip of the message (the text is in the third paragraph):

Comments (3)

  • This is a great synopsis. And I love that you took some video of the last speaker too! Yep, we need to get you a writing gig at The Scroll. :)

  • Hi Mary Ann - I definitely see the depth of your heart and mind come through in these posts! One question - do you think it's possible for complementarian & egalitarian views to coexist meaningfully (they do coexist now, b/c no doubt not everyone views things the same way or acts in congruency to themselves) - but i mean, do you think it's possible for convictions in both camps to exist and be meant to coexist? Or is one view reflecting more of God's heart in our present day?

  • Hi Natalie, Great question. Thanks for reading thoughtfully!

    I think that individuals from both camps are currently coexisting all over the world, as you mentioned. I think it's possible for them to serve God and minister to others right alongside each other. However, one or the other is probably not acting in congruency to their beliefs. For example, Pastor Dora was serving at a complementarian/hierarchical church for several years. For a long time, the leadership of the church would not allow her to teach -- because she was a woman. However, she chose to stay at that church simply because she felt that God was calling her to serve there and to effect change. She did. Eventually, they allowed her to teach Sunday school classes and things like that (perhaps preach too, I can't remember). This kind of environment is one that I am sure many gifted women find themselves in. They are gifted with teaching gifts, they are trained and well-educated but they are a part of an institution which doesn't believe their callings and giftings are valid -- at least, not to teach or have authority over men. Many women choose to stay for various reasons, and they are what you would call 'coexisting'... but perhaps not authentic to their beliefs. Awhile ago when we were having complementarian/egalitarian debates on my xanga, my friend Joe Lo mentioned that he is complementarian but the senior pastor at his church believes that women can teach/preach. He remains at the church though he feels that this is not how it should be. I believe he said that he listens when a woman has the pulpit, but I am not sure what he does with the dissonance... ??

    Do I think they are 'meant' to coexist? Well, considering the previous post from Dr. Gill's message about reconciliation, I do believe that God desires for His children to be at peace with one another and not to treat each other as enemies. so yes, at present, I do believe we need to coexist peacefully. However, I am sure you are well aware that I believe that God 'meant it' so that men and women would be able to serve in every arena which He has called and gifted them.

Comments are closed.

Post a Comment